Legal Opinion

McPherson Mercantile Co. v. Reliance Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 6, 1917No. 21,065PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from McPherson district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff brought these actions (which have been consolidated) to recover on two insurance policies on account of the loss of its stock of merchandise. There were sixteen policies in all, the claims under the others haying been adjusted. Each contained the standard clause against concurrent insurance without agreement indorsed or added. Each also contained the following indorsement: “$30,000 total concurrent insurance permitted.” It was shown that when the two policies were issued, which was in March and April, 1914, respectively, there…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pfiester v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Medley v. German Alliance InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Continental Insurance v. PearceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Washburn-Halligan Coffee Co. v. Merchants' Brick Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Philadelphia Underwriters, Insurance Co. of North America v. BigelowSupreme Court of Florida · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Reser v. Southern Kansas Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Blades v. FarmersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Gilbert v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. Stewart v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API