United States v. Charles Stagman v. Elmer Lawrence Wiethorn
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McCREE, Circuit Judge.
We consider two appeals by several defendants from convictions in the Unit*490ed States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky for violating the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952.1 We have consolidated these cases for purposes of this opinion because, although the facts differ in some respects, the decisive issues of law are the same.
The Travel Act subjects to criminal penalties:(a) Whoever travels in interstate * * * commerce or uses any facility in interstate * * * commerce, including the mail with intent to— * * *(3) -x- * x promote, manage, establish, carry on,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. David Hall and W. W. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- State v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- United States v. Emad Al-ZubaidyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Krear v. MalekDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.