Legal Opinion

United States v. Emad Al-Zubaidy

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2002No. 00-2343PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

This action stems from an interstate stalking charge under 18 U.S.C. § 2261A brought against Defendant Appellant Emad Al-Zubaidy. Al-Zubaidy argues that his bench trial conviction was not supported by sufficient evidence that he had formed the requisite intent under the statute, and that 18 U.S.C. § 2261A is an unconstitutional exercise of Congress’s Commerce Clause power. Al-Zubaidy now appeals from the conviction and sentence imposed by the district court.

This appeal presents two issues for our review: (1) Whether the district court properly denied Defendant’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. North American Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Daahir CaseerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. United National Insurance Company v. Sst Fitness CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Gary Glenn v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API