United States v. Emad Al-Zubaidy
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
This action stems from an interstate stalking charge under 18 U.S.C. § 2261A brought against Defendant Appellant Emad Al-Zubaidy. Al-Zubaidy argues that his bench trial conviction was not supported by sufficient evidence that he had formed the requisite intent under the statute, and that 18 U.S.C. § 2261A is an unconstitutional exercise of Congress’s Commerce Clause power. Al-Zubaidy now appeals from the conviction and sentence imposed by the district court.
This appeal presents two issues for our review: (1) Whether the district court properly denied Defendant’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- North American Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Daahir CaseerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United National Insurance Company v. Sst Fitness CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Gary Glenn v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.