Krear v. Malek
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the court are defendants, Dean Turner (“Turner”) and William Malek (“Ma-lek”) (hereinafter “Defendants”) motion to dismiss filed on March 29, 1996 and January 3, 1997 respectively. 1 Oral argument was heard on February 27, 1997. For the reasons discussed below, this court will grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss, in part, and allow plaintiffs to amend their complaint/rico case statement as directed by this opinion.
Background
This action involves a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Scott v. BoosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- John W. Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Abene v. Jaybar, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.