Legal Opinion

Hohensee v. Minear

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 16, 1970No. [No. 87, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants, Ervin and Richard Hohensee, are making their fourth attempt in this Court to rescue their land from the effects of a sale under a foreclosure of a deed of trust. In each appeal they have urged primarily that the sale is void because of fraud committed by the appellee-trustee and the note holder. The first two appeals, dismissed for appellate procedural defects (Md. Rules 825-31 and 835 b (8)), were from orders by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County ratifying the trustee’s, sale. The third, in addition to the fraud allegations, challenged the allowance of a $7,500 fee…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bachrach v. Washington United Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  2. Calvert v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  3. Tucker v. DudleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. Stokes v. DetrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  5. Butkus v. McClendonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Snider Bros., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Fairfax Savings, F.S.B. v. Kris Jen Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Kaylor v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Garland v. HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Wohl v. WohlmuthDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API