Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Snider Bros., Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1981No. 13271, 13876PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YEAGLEY, Associate Judge,

Retired:

These cases present the issue of whether a Maryland decree effecting a sale in foreclosure of property owned by appellants 1 precludes appellants’ subsequent suit in this forum asserting that they had been fraudulently induced to purchase the property (No. 13271) and, secondly, whether one of their partners violated his fiduciary duty to the partnership and is guilty of misrepresentation. The trial court found that collateral estoppel applied to bar the fraud claim and dismissed that portion of the complaint. Appellants cite that dismissal as error. 2…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Bachrach v. Washington United Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  5. Klein v. WhiteheadCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Smith v. JenkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Stutsman v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Goldkind v. Snider Bros., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Williams v. GerstenfeldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Oubre v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API