Legal Opinion
Kaylor v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 8, 1971No. [No. 192, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.
Article 81, § 99A of the Maryland Code (1957, 1969 Repl.Vol.) provides:
“When any tax sale made prior to January 1, 1944, has been finally ratified, then no court of equity or law in this State shall on and after June 1, 1966, entertain any proceedings to set aside or modify any title to any interest obtained in such sale.”
This appeal flows from a proceeding instituted in 1967 to challenge a 1938 tax sale. The appellees, Parran Wilson and the other heirs or devisees of James W. Wilson, filed an action in trespass guare clausum fregit against Harry W. Kaylor, the appellant. This represented an…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Marx v. HanthornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Comptroller of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- McMahan v. Dorchester Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Grantham v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Goen v. SansburyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lippert v. JungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Canaj, Inc. v. Baker and Division Phase IIICourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Bowie v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Hardisty v. KayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Ashe v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.