Legal Opinion

Williams v. Johnson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 1964No. 18237PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages sustained by her in an automobile collision which, the complaint alleged, occurred when the defendant negligently, reckessly, and willfully drove his automobile into the vehicle driven by the plaintiff. The answer of the defendant, in addition to a general denial, interposed, as a second defense, the contributory negligence and wilfulness of the plaintiff and, as a third defense, an accord and satisfaction between the parties, as a bar to recovery by the plaintiff. Upon the service of the answer, the plaintiff moved to strike…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Margolis v. TelechSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Kirkland v. Augusta-Aiken Ry. & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  4. Lorenzo v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  5. Mixson v. ROSSITERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fanning v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Wilson v. Builders Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. HyattCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Sturcken v. Richland Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API