Legal Opinion

Fanning v. Hicks

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 28, 1985No. 22251PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Respondent Fanning seeks to recover damages for guns converted by appellant Hicks. The jury awarded Fanning $2,900 actual and $15,000 punitive damages. We affirm.

Fanning’s home was burglarized and 21 guns were stolen. Hicks was charged as an accessory before the fact to the housebreaking and grand larceny. He returned eight of the 21 guns and pled nolo contendré to one count of receiving stolen goods.

Hicks’ sentence was suspended upon the payment of a fine and two years probation. As a special condition of probation, the court ordered Hicks to make immediate restitution to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Redmond v. StrangeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  2. Williams v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Mercury Marine Division, of Brunswick Corp. v. CostasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Seigler v. Yeargin Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API