Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sturcken v. Richland Oil Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 24, 1966No. 18553Published

1DissentLewis, Justice

The plaintiff sustained injury and damage in a collision between his automobile and a truck of the defendant, for which he was awarded judgment in the amount of $25,-000.00 actual damages. The defendant has appealed from the judgment, contending that a new trial should be granted *358because of alleged error in the instructions to the jury and certain rulings with respect to the admissibility of testimony. The questions will be disposed of in that order.

The complaint alleged that plaintiff’s damage was brought about by the “negligence, carelessness, recklessness, willfulness and wantonness” of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Fulghum v. BleakleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Field v. GREGORYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Hicks v. McCANDLISHSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. Proctor v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  5. Sample v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API