Legal Opinion
Miller v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided September 10, 1926No. 12063PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Citiee Justice Watts.
The “Case” contains the following statement:
“The cause above named was begun by the service of summons and complaint in July, 1923, but the summons and complaint were never served on defendant Arthur Pulley, and first came on for trial before his Plonor, Judge Milledge T. Bonham, and a jury, May 1, 2, and 3, 1924, term of the Court of Common Pleas for Richland County, and resulted in a mistrial. The case next came for trial before his Honor, Judge Wm. H. Townsend, and a jury, on May-22 and 23, 1924, and resulted in a verdict…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- City of Dallas v. MaxwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Chisolm v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Sandel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ford v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Mishoe v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Squyres v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Mock Ex Rel. Estate of Mock v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Locklear v. Southeastern Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.