Legal Opinion

Cupo Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1958No. Appeal, No. 140PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

In tMs unemployment compensation case benefits were denied to tbe claimant-appellant by tbe Bureau of Employment Security, tbe referee and tbe Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, for tbe reason that he left his employment voluntarily without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature and was therefore barred from benefits under tbe provisions of §402(b) of tbe act. Section 402(b) of tbe Unemployment Compensation Law, as amended, 43 PS §802(b), provides: “An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any weék—

“(a) ...
“(b) In which bis unemployment is due to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Bee Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Goldstein Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. McGuire v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mettetal Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Hambridge Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Junda Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Naugle Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Fegely Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API