Mettetal Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
In this unemployment compensation case the Bureau of Employment Security, the referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review all concluded that the appellant had voluntarily terminated his employment without cause of necessitous and compelling nature, and was therefore ineligible for compensation by virtue of the provisions of section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law. 43 PS §802(b).
Section 402(b) provides that “an employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week ... (b) In which his unemployment is due to voluntarily leaving work without…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Tronieri Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Pusey Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Hoffstot v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Miller Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pennsylvania Insurance Department v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Miller Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Goldstein Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Junda Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Novak Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.