Legal Opinion

Fegely Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1960No. Appeal, No. 321PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an unemployment compensation case in which the Bureau of Employment Security, the Referee and the Board of Review all concluded that Ray M. Fegely, the claimant, was not entitled to benefits because his unemployment was due to voluntarily leaving employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature, in violation of Section 402(b) of the *143Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(b).

The claimant was last employed on July 11, 1958, as a burner by Westinghouse Electric Company, Lester, Pennsylvania, at $2.39 per hour. By virtue of the terms of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Smith Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Mollo Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Longobardi v. Unemployment Insurance Appeal BoardSuperior Court of Delaware · 1971
  2. Armco Steel Corp. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Efkamp v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API