Legal Opinion
Central Bank v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1973No. Docket Nos. 13742, 13596PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.
In these two mandate proceedings Central Bank, a national bank, invokes section 94 of title 12, United States Code, which provides: “Actions and proceedings against any association under this chapter may be had in any district or Territorial court of the United States held within the district in which such association may be established, or in any State, county, or municipal court in the county or city in which said association is located having jurisdiction in similar cases.”
Having been named as one of a group of defendants in two separate but similar lawsuits in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- First National Bank in St. Louis v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. BougasSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harry Bechtel and Cathleen Bechtel, Husband and Wife v. Liberty National Bank, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- South Padre Development Co. v. Texas Commerce Bank National Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Murphy v. First National Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.