Legal Opinion

Savings Bank v. Mundt

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1924No. File No. 5174PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, P. J.

During the spring and summer of 1919, one Roy M. Donahoe 'borrowed of plaintiff hank about $6,500. He was at the time a renter on the farm' of defendant and was also defendant’s son-in-law. Donahoe owned all the 'horses, cattle, *163and machinery on the farm. On November 26, 1919, Donahoe requested an additional-loan from plaintiff bank of $1,500, and the evidence tended to show that, to obtain this loan, he represented to plaintiff that he had decided to quit farming and sell out; that plaintiff should have the- sale and was to pay itself from the proceeds of the sale for the whole amount of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Westall v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Coram v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Earle v. Sunnyside Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Christiansen v. StrandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Dorman v. Crooks State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Central Tractor & Equipment Co. v. BetzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Kruger v. KrugerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API