Legal Opinion
Central Tractor & Equipment Co. v. Betz
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 1935No. File No. 7704PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
The defendant, Paul Betz, entered into a contract with the state of South Dakota for the construction of a certain highway in Lincoln county, S. D. The Western Surety Company executed a bond guaranteeing the completion of Betz’ contract. The ' defendant failed and was unable to pay debts incurred in the construction of said highway. The Western Surety Company as surety has hadi to pay $7,545.65 for materials and labor.- Of this amount said surety company has received $4,901.14 from the state. It has paid out $2,644.60 without being reimbursed therefor. The state 'under admitted facts still…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ingersoll v. CoramSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Hall v. Kansas City Terra Cotta Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Williams v. MarklandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Margulies v. OgdieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943