Dorman v. Crooks State Bank
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FULLER, C.
By this appeal from an order of the circuit court overruling its demurrer, the appellant, Crooks State Bank, challenges the sufficiency of plaintiff’s complaint to constitute a cause of action. The pleading- of respondent, D’orman, the plaintiff below, alleges in substance that plaintiff is the owner of a de*213scribed tract of land in Minnehaha county; that the appellant, Crooks State Bank, was plaintiff’s agent in the leasing of said-premises and in looking- after the collection of rental due to plaintiff ; that during the farming seasons of 1920 and 1921 the plaintiff leased said…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alter v. Bank of StockhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Ingram v. CowlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. StockdaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Siems v. Pierre Savings BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Albien v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Christiansen v. StrandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Rovenko v. BokovoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Wilson v. PolsfutNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Tharp v. St. Georges Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
- Black Hills Institute of Geological Research, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation v. Maurice WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.