D'Angelo v. Gardner
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*707OPINION1
By the Court,
Springer, J.:
Having allowed rehearing and argument in regard to the above-captioned matters, the court now issues the following consolidated opinion and decision with regard thereto.
D’ANGELO v. GARDNER, ET AL., DOCKET NO. 20452
This is a wrongful discharge case.2 GEMCO claims that D’Angelo is an at-will employee and that he was subject to dismissal at any time without cause. D’Angelo claims that he is not subject to at-will termination but must, rather, be terminated only in accordance with the contract of the parties as evidenced by the handbook and in other ways.
This…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Lansalot A. Olguin v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Hansen v. Harrah'sNevada Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Kaldi v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 2001
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.