Legal Opinion

Woodhouse v. United States

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided July 26, 1996No. Civil No. 96-3040. Criminal No. 90-30039PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

In the wake of Bailey, the Government wants to resentence. Resentence it must be.

I. Background

On August 23, 1990, Petitioner Russell Woodhouse was indicted for: count I — conspiring to distribute LSD, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and § 846; count II — distributing LSD, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); and count Ill-using a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1).

On December 4, 1990, Woodhouse pleaded guilty to counts I (conspiring to distribute LSD) and III (using a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime).…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo PupoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Charles ShueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Barry Davis, A/K/A "Mark Johnson"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Townsend, DerrickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. BenbrookCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. Gordils v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  5. United States v. CrowderDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API