United States v. Crowder
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDGAR, District Judge.
Defendant Michael Crowder (“Crowder”) has made a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He contends that his judgment of conviction and sentence under Count 2 of the indictment for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) should be vacated and set aside in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bailey v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). Defendant argues that there was an insufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea for using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug-trafficking crime. The…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Daniel P. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Hawkins v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Irving Houston Hawkins v. Franklin FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Daniel P. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001