Legal Opinion
Gordils v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 23, 1996No. 96 Civ. 2664 (DNE), 96 Civ. 1747 (DNE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This matter is before this Court on the petitions of Jose Gordils (“Gordils”) and Nicholas Mpounas (Mpounas”) (“petitioners”) pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2255 (“Section 2255” or the “habeas corpus statute”) to vacate their convictions under Title 18, United States Code, Section 924(c) (“Section 924(c)”) in the wake of Bailey v. United States, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). This Court previously vacated petitioners’ Section 924(c) sentences and found that they should be resentenced on their remaining convictions,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo PupoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. David StevensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Jose Ramon Gordils and Nicholas Mpounas, Gregory Melendez and Francisco BastarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Mpounas v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Burgess v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Gordils v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999