Legal Opinion

Monarch Real Estate Co. v. Frye

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1922No. 10,891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action by appellant against appellees to enjoin them from closing and interfering with an alleyway alleged to be appurtenant to appellant’s real estate in-the city of Elkhart, Indiana, and to establish an easement in such alleyway.

There was a special finding of facts, which facts so far as here involved, are in substance as follows:

Cyrus E. Frye, hereinafter mentioned as appellee, and his immediate and remote predecessors in title, for more than fifty years last past, have been the owners in fee simple of a part of Lot No. 54 of the First Addition to the town (now city) of Elkhart, Indiana,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Anthony v. Kennard Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  3. Parish v. KaspareIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Worthley v. BurbanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. O'DELL v. StegallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Brown v. HeidersbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Simmons v. PerkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Ballard v. HarmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Wilfong v. Cessna Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API