Legal Opinion

Brown v. Heidersbach

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1977No. 3-375A34PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStaton, P.J.

The Browns platted some of their property on Lake George. The Smiths and Heidersbachs held title to several of the platted lots and enjoyed an easement to the lake. Later, the Browns platted additional property and gave the titleholders of these lots the use of the same easement. The Smiths 1 and the Heidersbachs brought an action which sought an exclusive use of the easement and damages. The trial court rendered a judgment for the Smiths and Heidersbachs. Later, the Browns appealed.

After reviewing the evidence, we conclude that the trial court committed reversible error, and we reverse.

I

Evide…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. New York Central Railroad v. YarianIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Riggs v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Sanxay v. HungerIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Watson v. ThibodeauIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Howard v. United StatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Klotz v. HornIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Harlan Bakeries, Inc. v. MuncyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Carnahan v. Moriah Property Owners Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API