Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas Louis De Lime III

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 15, 1955No. 11379_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

The defendant, De Lime, has appealed from a judgment of conviction, D.C., 121 F.Supp. 750, he having been found guilty of failure to submit to induction as required by the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 462. He had sought to be classified as a conscientious objector but had been classified I-A. The ease was tried to the court and the defendant was found guilty. See 121 F.Supp. 750. The defendant contends that he was denied due process of law and that error was committed by the court below.

The defendant’s Local Board mailed to him the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Cox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Gonzales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. United States v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arthur Parisette Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  2. Wesley Lawrence Uffelman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. United States v. Frank Mekolichick, Jr., United States of America v. David Charles WennerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. David Neill MacMurray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. United States v. McDonaldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API