Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Mekolichick, Jr., United States of America v. David Charles Wenner

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 15, 1956No. 11794, 11795PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

These two Selective Service cases present the same major problem with an additional proposition raised in the Wen-ier appeal.

In Mekolichick, the registrant asserted he was a minister of religion and a conscientious objector. The board denied both claims. He was given a personal hearing, thereafter reclassified as 1-0 and assigned to civilian work. He reported, undertook the hospital work assigned him and was classified I-W. He worked about four months and then left the hospital. At the trial Mekoli-chick testified that he made an inspection of the bulletin board of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  3. United States v. StilesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  4. United States v. ZieberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  5. United States v. HagamanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Emil Yaich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. Howard Charles Lipsitz v. Major General Gines Perez, Commanding General, Fort Jackson, South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. Connecticut Light and Power Company v. LeedomDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
  4. United States v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1967
  5. United States v. PyrtleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API