United States v. Frank Mekolichick, Jr., United States of America v. David Charles Wenner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MeLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
These two Selective Service cases present the same major problem with an additional proposition raised in the Wen-ier appeal.
In Mekolichick, the registrant asserted he was a minister of religion and a conscientious objector. The board denied both claims. He was given a personal hearing, thereafter reclassified as 1-0 and assigned to civilian work. He reported, undertook the hospital work assigned him and was classified I-W. He worked about four months and then left the hospital. At the trial Mekoli-chick testified that he made an inspection of the bulletin board of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. StilesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- United States v. ZieberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- United States v. HagamanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Emil Yaich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- United States of America Ex Rel. Howard Charles Lipsitz v. Major General Gines Perez, Commanding General, Fort Jackson, South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Connecticut Light and Power Company v. LeedomDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1967
- United States v. PyrtleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.