Legal Opinion

David Neill MacMurray v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1964No. 18792_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

After unsuccessfully claiming the exemption from military service afforded conscientious objectors by 50 U.S.C.A. App. § 456(j) (62 Stat. 609 (1948), as amended), 1 appellant refused to submit to induction into the Armed Forces of the United States. He was convicted of violating 50 U.S.C.A.App. § 462(a) (62 Stat. 622 (1948)), and appealed.

He contends (1) that the induction order was invalid because the Department of Justice did not conduct a hearing with respect to his objections as required by section 456(j), and (2) that section 456 (j) violates the First Amendment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Torcaso v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Gonzales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. United States v. Arno Sascha JakobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elliott Ashton Welsh, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. HaughtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1968
  3. Elliott Ashton Welsh, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Jerry Paul PritchardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. Jerry Paul PritchardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API