Legal Opinion

QUINTERO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1982No. ID 2930PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2930 MATTER OF QUINTERO In Deportation Proceedings A-24229344 • Decided by Board November 16, 1982 • (1) Deferred action status, granted pursuant to Operations Fnstructions 103.1(a)(1)(ii), is a matter of the District Director's prosecutorial discretion and, therefore, neither the immigration judge nor the Board may grant such status or review a decision of the Dis- trict Director to deny it. (2) Deferred action status may be requested at any stage in deportation proceedings and, therefore, it was not error for the immigration judge to refuee to adjourn the hearing for an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Merced Hernandez-Rivera and Carlota Garcia-Vasquez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. John Winston Ono Lennon v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. L. G. Balfour Company, a Corporation, and Burr, Patterson & Auld Company, a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  4. George Bernard Nicholas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. CHOULIARISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. SHAARBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
  2. L-A-B-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
  3. W-Y-UBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
  4. GARCIABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
  5. L-N-YBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API