Legal Opinion
Merced Hernandez-Rivera and Carlota Garcia-Vasquez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1980No. 78-3556PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”) dismissing their appeal of an Immigration Judge’s order denying their request for 15 months voluntary departure time. The Board dismissed the appeal on two separate grounds: (1) The appeal was not timely filed; (2) The Board has no jurisdiction under 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(b)(2) (1979) to review the denial of a greater period of voluntary departure time than that fixed by the immigration judge.
For the reasons discussed below, we have concluded that under these facts…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Juan Cesar Vargas v. U.S. Department of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Ram Singh, AKA Singh Ram Sukhdev Ram v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.