Legal Opinion
SHAAR
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1996No. ID 3290PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3290 Interim Decision #3290 In re Arie SHAAR, Respondent File A72 519 787 et al.- Los Angeles Decided July 11, 1996 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) An alien who has filed a motion to reopen during the pendency of a voluntary departure period in order to apply for suspension of deportation and who subsequently remains in the United States after the scheduled date of departure is statutorily ineligible for suspension of deportation pursuant to section 242B(e)(2)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- VELARDEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- Mahmood v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Ramirez-Alejandre v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- M-SBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998
- Salvador Azarte Celia Castellon v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.