Legal Opinion
W-Y-U
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2017No. ID 3889PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
27 I&N Dec. 17
(BIA 2017) Interim Decision #3889 Matter of W-Y-U-, Respondent Decided April 18, 2017 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) The primary consideration for an Immigration Judge in evaluating whether to administratively close or recalendar proceedings is whether the party opposing administrative closure has provided a persuasive reason for the case to proceed and be resolved on the merits. Matter of Avetisyan,
25 I&N Dec. 688
(BIA 2012), clarified. (2) In considering administrative closure, an Immigration Judge…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- HASHMIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
- AVETISYANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
- GUTIERREZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
- G-N-CBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- CASTRO-TUMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- Jesus Zuniga Romero v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Yeison Meza Morales v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Hector Zelaya Diaz v. Jeffrey A. RosenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- J. Marquez-Reyes v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.