Legal Opinion
Texarkana v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 27, 1932No. Cr. 3806PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
In the trial of this ease in the court below the court, after hearing the testimony, made a finding of facts, the correctness of which is not questioned. It reads as follows:
“The court finds that H. H. Taylor is a resident of Texarkana, Texas, is a practicing attorney of that city, that he has an office in that city and has no office in Texarkana, Arkansas. He is here prosecuted for failing to pay an occupation tax to the city of Texarkana, Arkansas, for 1931. During that year he appeared in the municipal court of Texarkana, Arkansas, as attorney for various parties at least 25 times. He had…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Davies v. Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Shepherd v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- McIntosh v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arnke v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Texarkana v. James & Mayo Realty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Lister v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2003