Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided September 23, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Michael Lamoureux State Representative P.O. Box 1064 Russellville, AR 72811-1064

Dear Representative Lamoureux:

You have presented the following questions for my opinion:(1) Do the assessment fees, application fees, and other department fees assessed by the State Banking Department on banks in the state under the authority of A.C.A. § 23-46-509 prevent or prohibit a city of the first class from assessing a municipal occupational tax or business license under the authority A.C.A. § 26-77-102 on banks conducting business within the city limits of that city?(2) Is there any provision…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davies v. Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Gray v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. City of Mountain Home v. DrakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Pine Bluff Transfer Co. v. NicholSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Texarkana v. James & Mayo Realty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API