Legal Opinion

Texarkana v. James & Mayo Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 10, 1933No. 4-3067PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). The statutes of the State' authorize cities of the first class to levy an occupation tax requiring any person, firm, individual or corporation, who shall engage in, carry on or follow any trade, business, profession, vocation or calling within the corporate limits of such city, to take out and procure a license therefor and pay into the city treasury such a sum or amount of money as may be specified for such license and privilege. Section 5 of article 16 of the Constitution of 1874; § 7618, Crawford & Moses’ Digest. See also 37 C. J. 181.

The State can levy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arkadelphia Lumber Co. v. ArkadelphiaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  2. Board of Commissioners v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Waterbury v. NetherlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Blytheville v. WebbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Texarkana v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. DuncanDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1949
  2. Savo v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2011
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2000
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API