Legal Opinion
Arnke v. City of Berkeley
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1960No. Civ. 19283PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOLDRICK, J. pro tem. *
This is a proceeding for declaratory relief in which appellant prays for a judgment declaring that city of Berkeley Ordinance Number 2805-N.S., as amended, is void, unconstitutional and ineffective and that defendants be permanently restrained and enjoined from the enforcement of said ordinance against him.
The trial court adjudged said ordinance to be valid and constitutional in all respects as applied to appellant and subjected him to the payment of the business license tax provided therein. The appeal is taken from this decree.
The facts are not in dispute. Appellant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Los Angeles v. Belridge Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Security Truck Line v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Agnew v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Agnew v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- The Pines v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Oakland Raiders v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Westfield-Palos Verdes Co. v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Willingham Bus Lines, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.