Horah v. . Knox
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Issue of devisavit ml non tried at January Special Term, 1882, of Mecklenburg Superior Court, before Bennett, J. Judgment for plaintiffs, appeal by defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
The exceptions contained in the appeal are taken to the'rulings of the court on the trial of the issue, raised by the caveat to the script propounded as the will of Ann Sterling, and submitted to the jury. Is the said paper writing, or any part thereof, and if so, what part, the last will and testament of Ann Sterling, or not V1
The script is in few words, was executed in March, 1877, in the presence of two attesting witnesses, and gives all the estate of the deceased, real and personal, to the propounder, Margaret Horah, as due for her kindness and attention during the long affliction of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knight v. . HoughtallingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Huffman v. . ClickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- Morgan v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Harrison v. ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Sprinkle v. Wellborn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. . PottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Cashwell v. Fayetteville Pepsi-Cola Bottling WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- In Re Will of CravenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.