Legal Opinion

Loizeaux v. Fremder

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1904PublishedCited by 21 opinions

A pptüat. from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: J. C. Ludwig, Judge. On August 19, 1898, John Eremder, husband of tbe respondent, borrowed of Henry Herman $4,000 for use in bis business of a boot and sboe dealer, of wbicb no part came to tbe private use of tbe respondent or was for tbe benefit of ber separate property.

Read the full summary

A pptüat. from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: J. C. Ludwig, Judge. On August 19, 1898, John Eremder, husband of tbe respondent, borrowed of Henry Herman $4,000 for use in bis business of a boot and sboe dealer, of wbicb no part came to tbe private use of tbe respondent or was for tbe benefit of ber separate property. On tbe same date tbe husband and wife ■executed a note in tbe same form as that described in Thorp v. Mindeman, mite, p. 149, 101 N. W. 417, payable in three years, with six per cent, semiannual interest, and also executed a single mortgage upon two parcels…

1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.

When one enjoying tbe confidence of tbe community in wbieb be bas acted as intermediary between investors and borrowers of money proves to bave been botb dishonest and insolvent, complieatmns arise of tbe most serious character, in which tbe attempt to do justice must, of necessity, be painful to tbe courts; for, whatever tbe result, one party or tbe other — and often botb — must suffer injury; sometimes ruin. Tbe strain upon tbe human sympathies is frequently such as to render difficult adherence to settled rules of law, which, in individual cases, may seem to cast tbe burden of tbe wrong on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hollinshead v. John Stuart & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bartel v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Joy v. VanceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kingman v. GrahamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chase v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Marling v. FitzGeraldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Marling v. NommensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Weigell v. GreggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bautz v. AdamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API