Joy v. Vance
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Clinton. (Daboll, J.) Bill to foreclose a mortgage. Complainants appeal» The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The complainants purchased a mortgage and four accompanying notes from Walker & White. As the interest notes came due, they were sent to the Michi*98■gan Mortgage Company for collection. With the last of these was sent a letter of which a copy follows:
“ Detroit, Mich., Feb. 25, ’91.
“Michigan Mortgage Co., Lim.,
“St. Johns, Mich.
“ Gentlemen: Inclosed you will find, for collection, interest coupon of James D. Estes for $52.50, due at your office Feb. 24, ’91; also interest coupon of Emerson Vance for $130, due at your office Feb. 28, ’91. Please receive these .amounts, and remit to me;
“The Emerson…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Campbell v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wilson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Loizeaux v. FremderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Ulen v. KnecttleWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Koen v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Corey v. HunterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.