Legal Opinion

Joy v. Vance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1895PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Clinton. (Daboll, J.) Bill to foreclose a mortgage. Complainants appeal» The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The complainants purchased a mortgage and four accompanying notes from Walker & White. As the interest notes came due, they were sent to the Michi*98■gan Mortgage Company for collection. With the last of these was sent a letter of which a copy follows:

“ Detroit, Mich., Feb. 25, ’91.
“Michigan Mortgage Co., Lim.,
“St. Johns, Mich.
“ Gentlemen: Inclosed you will find, for collection, interest coupon of James D. Estes for $52.50, due at your office Feb. 24, ’91; also interest coupon of Emerson Vance for $130, due at your office Feb. 28, ’91. Please receive these .amounts, and remit to me;
“The Emerson…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Loizeaux v. FremderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ulen v. KnecttleWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Koen v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Corey v. HunterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API