Kingman v. Graham
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Grant County. The case is thus stated by Mr. Justice Tatloe: “ This is au action of ejectment, to recover from the defendr ants the undivided two-thirds of certain real estate situated in Muscoda, in this state. The property is village lots, and had thereon a steam mill, which had been used for several years for the manufacture of cooperage materials.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Grant County. The case is thus stated by Mr. Justice Tatloe: “ This is au action of ejectment, to recover from the defendr ants the undivided two-thirds of certain real estate situated in Muscoda, in this state. The property is village lots, and had thereon a steam mill, which had been used for several years for the manufacture of cooperage materials. The proofs upon the trial establish certain facts beyond dispute: First, that on 4th day of March, 1872, Marshall Kingman, the father of the plantiff, owned the undivided two-thirds, and one Joseph Ohalders…
1Opinion of the CourtTayloR, J.
Upon the trial the defendants did not rely upon showing that the deed from Marshall Kingman to the plaintiff was fraudulent and void as to the defendants or any other person; and, although they excepted to the finding of fact by the learned circuit judge, “ that the deed from Marshall Kingman to the plaintiff was duly executed and delivered, and was made in good faith, and upon a sufficient and valuable consideration, and without any fraudulent intent to hinder, delay, cheat or defraud the defendants or either of them, or any other person or persons,” the finding seems to be *240sustained, by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Wusthoff v. DracourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
- Norton v. KearneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Vilas v. MasonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Ford v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Throckmorton v. PenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Elmonte Investment Co. v. Schafer Bros. Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
- Knauf & Tesch Co. v. Elkhart Lake Sand & Gravel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Loizeaux v. FremderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Two Rivers Manufacturing Co. v. DayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.