Legal Opinion

Han Cao v. Upchurch

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 2007No. Civil Action 07-1232PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DALZELL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek an order compelling the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) to act on their applications to adjust their immigration status to that of permanent residency. There being no disputed facts, this case turns on the existence of our jurisdiction over the subject matter and our authority to compel agency action under these circumstances. We review these issues in detail below.

Facts

Dr. Han Cao and his wife, Natalja Karol, plaintiffs in this action, have applied to have their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Yu Zhao v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. Mohammed Nasir Khan v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Saleem v. KeislerDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007
  2. Aslam v. MukaseyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  3. Kashkool v. ChertoffDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  4. Nigmadzhanov v. MuellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. City of Phila. v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API