Legal Opinion

Saleem v. Keisler

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 26, 2007No. 06-C-712-CPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.

The question in this case is whether a remedy in federal district court exists for the failure of immigration officials to decide a noncitizen’s application for adjustment of status from nonimmigrant to permanent resident. Plaintiff Mohammed Saleem, an Indian citizen seeking permanent residence in the United States, contends that jurisdiction for his claim is present under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and that the government can be compelled to act under either the Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, or the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Felix Hilario Secaida-Rosales v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Elliot Ray v. Marc ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Aslam v. MukaseyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  3. Kashkool v. ChertoffDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  4. Nigmadzhanov v. MuellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. Litvin v. ChertoffDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API