Franco v. Davis
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
. The opinion of the court was delivered
Pee Cueiam.
This is an intra-family negligence case. The plaintiff made two basic contentions at the trial level, which she reasserts here. One is that this case is different enough factually from Hastings v. Hastings, 33 N. J. 247 (1960), in which we held that a negligence action could not be maintained by an unemancipated child against her parent, so that the principles of that decision should not bar this suit. The second is that, in any event, Hastings ought to be reconsidered in view of subsequent developments in this field of the law in this and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Briere v. BriereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
- Hebel v. Hebel Ex Rel. HebelAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Balts v. BaltsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Teramano v. TeramanoOhio Supreme Court · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Foldi v. JeffriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Darrow v. Hanover TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- State v. BontempoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.