Briere v. Briere
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The parties agree that the issue is whether unemancipated minor children may sue their father in tort for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. If they may, their exceptions to the dismissal of their actions must be sustained. Whether their mother may recover for consequential damages depends upon questions of fact, determinable at the trial and presently not before us. Woodman v. Peck, 90 N. H. 292, 294; McConnell v. Lamontagne, 82 N. H. 423; Bullard v. McCarthy, 89 N. H. 158, 164; see Levesque v. Levesque, 99 N. H. 147, 149-150, dissenting opinion. If the children’s actions cannot…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Overlock v. RuedemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
3Cited by123 opinions
- Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Sargent v. RossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Hebel v. Hebel Ex Rel. HebelAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.