Legal Opinion
Darrow v. Hanover Township
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 7, 1971PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
58 N.J. 410 (1971)
278 A.2d 200
GERALD P. DARROW AND HERMA DARROW, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
HANOVER TOWNSHIP, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND THE COUNTY OF MORRIS, DEFENDANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued April 26, 1971.
Argued April 27, 1971.
Decided June 7, 1971.
Mr. Myron J. Bromberg argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, attorneys; Messrs. Myron J. Bromberg, Thomas R. Chesson and Brian M. Laddey on the brief).
Mr. Martin B. Wallerstein argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, McCoid &…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Grigoletti v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Renz v. Penn Central Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Jersey Shore Medical Center-Fitkin Hospital v. Estate of BaumSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Mirza v. Filmore Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Cogliati v. Ecco High Frequency Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.