Legal Opinion

Rittigstein v. Dignan

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1932No. Docket No. 8399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued for the specific performance of a contract to sell real property. Defendant had judgment, from which the plaintiff has appealed on typewritten transcripts.

The contract was in writing upon a form generally used by members of the San Francisco Real Estate Board. When presented to the defendant for signature it read (in part) : “Received from Bruce Painter, hereinafter designated as the purchaser, the sum of Five Hundred ($500.00) Dollars being deposited on account of Twenty Thousand ($20,000:00) Dollars lawful money of the United States of America, the purchase of the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Joyce v. TomasiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Miller v. GustaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Salisbury v. YawgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Walker v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. George v. WestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Anderson v. PerminterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Mueller v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Haidopoulos v. WoollettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API