Mueller v. Chandler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CONLEY, J. *
The defendant appeals from a decree of specific performance of an alleged agreement to encumber real property. The appellant represents herself and has filed a voluminous brief which urges numerous erroneous contentions and raises inconsequential issues. She argues at length that the trial court should have accepted her evidence with regard to the existence of the indebtedness rather than that of her opponent, forgetting or not knowing that all that an appellate court can do with respect to factual issues where there is conflicting evidence is to determine whether the findings are…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Buckmaster v. BertramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Klein v. MarkarianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Gould v. CallanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henderson v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Lawrence v. ShuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. TappanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Lister v. SorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968