Legal Opinion

Donea v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1945No. 34,021PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff as beneficiary sues on an insurance policy for $5,000 issued by defendant on her former husband’s life. Plaintiff claimed that the insured was dead by presumption on August 15,1943. This defendant denied. There was no direct proof that he was either dead or alive on the date mentioned. In order to establish the presumption of death, plaintiff introduced evidence to show insured’s unexplained disappearance from his home without any tidings from him for a continuous period of over seven successive years. Defendant’s evidence consisted of the life mortality tables…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Moeller v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Ogren v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Butler v. . Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. TePoel v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Storey v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Koenigs v. ThomeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Dozier v. KrmpotichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API