Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Eugene v. Woodrich

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1983No. TC 16-82-08260; SC 29275PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

By petition for a writ of mandamus the City of Eugene brings to this court the question whether a circuit court may deny or delay an order of immediate possession of land, when the city has brought an action to condemn the land and has deposited the estimated compensation with the circuit court. The course of the proceedings presents issues of mandamus procedure in this court interrelated with events in the condemnation action in the circuit court.

The city filed its petition on January 17,1983, and we issued an alternative writ on February 25. The writ recited the following facts.

In July…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Falkner v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Oregon Medical Ass'n v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Port of Umatilla v. RICHMONDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Concerned Citizens, United, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Emerald People's Utility District v. PacificorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Wiard Memorial Park District v. Wiard Community Pool, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Powder Valley Water Control District v. Hart Estate Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Schrock FarmsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API