Josal, Inc. v. Rolling Park Homes, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Flood, J.,
The defendants Feinberg and Budwesky owned two adjoining tracts. The first they sold to the plaintiff, the second to the additional defendant, Rolling Park Homes, Inc. The contour of the land was such that the tract bought by the plaintiff had an excess of dirt whereas the tract bought by Rolling Park needed dirt for fill. In the agreement of sale to the plaintiff, defendants obligated themselves to remove the excess dirt from the plaintiff’s tract. In the agreement of sale to Rolling Park, the purchaser, Rolling Park undertook to remove the same dirt from the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. Cheltenham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Shaull v. AS Beck New York Shoe Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Briggs v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Pittsb. Carbon Co. v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
3Cited by8 opinions
- Extrudo Film Corp. v. Beck Electric Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Greller v. Hortter Building Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Seaboard Construction Co. v. Continental Mortgage InvestorsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1969
- Raymond S. Hess, Inc. v. Kutner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1978
- Flick v. Lorence, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Butler County1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.