Legal Opinion

Flick v. Lorence

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Butler County

Decided April 24, 1968No. 188Published

1Opinion of the Court

Acker, J.,

The matter for determination is whether the motion to strike the attempt at joinder of an additional defendant should be sustained. The answer must be “yes”. The action is in assumpsit, claiming $8,400 by plaintiff property owners against defendants, who executed a written agreement of sale for real property in the City of Butler. Defendants answer that subsequent to the agreement of April 12, 1967, they discovered that there was, in fact, no new wiring as represented to them by plaintiff’s real estate agent through his employe, Phyllis D. Holt. In addition to their answer,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Miller v. PreitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. Cheltenham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Prost v. Caldwell Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Steele v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API